Use of body worn cameras by crossing patrols to be discussed by Hertfordshire cllrs

For the past 12 months a crossing patrol in Hemel has been used to trial the use of body worn cameras
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The use of body worn cameras by school crossing patrols is to be considered by county councillors in Hertfordshire, on Friday (February 5).

For the past 12 months a crossing patrol in Hemel Hempstead has been used to trial the use of body worn cameras.

And there have been suggestions that rolling out the cameras across the county would ensure drivers comply with stop requests – as well as reducing any possible intimidation.

Stock imageStock image
Stock image

On Friday a meeting of the county council’s highways and environment cabinet panel will consider the issue, in response to a Liberal Democrat motion initially put to a previous council meeting.

At the meeting councillors will be asked to back a recommendation to cabinet that the trial continues, in order to collect more “meaningful data”.

And they will be asked to recommend that the data is then reviewed in the summer (2021), ‘to consider whether a wider roll out is proportionate and warranted’.

According to a report prepared for the panel the ‘body cam’ was issued to a crossing patrol in Hemel Hempstead in February last year (2020) – following reports of three ‘drive throughs’.

One further incident was reported by the patrol later that month, but footage of the ‘perpetrator’ was not captured on camera.

And highways bosses – who point to the suspension of school crossing patrol service during the two lockdowns – say the results of the current trial have been “inconclusive”.

Overall in the county last year (2020) there were 16 ‘incidents’ – which can be ‘drive throughs’ or reports of verbal abuse – reported from 150 crossing patrol sites. And there were 15 in 2019.

It is estimated that the cost of issuing every school crossing patrol with a body cam would be around £105,000.

Reporting on the progress of the trial, the report to the cabinet panel says the use of the camera made the ‘patrol’ “feel safe”.

But it said she was also concerned that it may upset members of the public or change the relationship she had with parents and children.

The report also suggests feedback from other crossing patrols is “not conclusive” – with some welcoming the move and others expressing concerns that it would change their relationships with parents and children.

A number of other local authorities – including Suffolk, Sussex and Essex – are reported to use body worn cameras.

But, according to the report, the county council is not aware of any council that issues the cameras to every patrol.

Body worn cameras can already be issued in an ’emergency’ in Hertfordshire, says the report, at sites reporting ‘fail to stop’ incidents or verbal abuse.

The issue will be discussed by a meeting of the county council’s highways and environment cabinet panel on Friday (February 5).

The meeting – which will be held virtually – is public, and can be viewed here.